Stress and performance
Last Updated on Friday, 08 July 2011 11:47 Sunday, 12 June 2011 15:40
Work needs ups and downs
Stress – of the right kind, at the right time, and in the right amount – can help you in your job, by stimulating your thought and creativity, and by giving you the energy boost you need to ratchet up your performance.
But if work-related stress is maintained at a high pitch for too long, the exact opposite happens. When you start being adversely affected by your stress, you may try to plug the gaps in the quality of your output by working harder…and becoming even more stressed, which actually leads to a poorer performance over time.
The impact becomes more and more marked, as you continue to work longer and apparently more intensively, while at the same time, you become increasingly less effective. It’s as if the harder you work, the less you achieve.
When it all gets too much
This sort of accumulated and unrelenting stress can lead to serious physical and emotional/mental effects – and colloquial phrases like ‘cracking up’ and ‘having a breakdown’ describe them well, and remind us of the similar effects of stress on a building. The right amount is ‘right’ for a bridge or a joist or a door frame. But too much of the wrong sort eventually leads to collapse.
The ‘Yerkes–Dodson law’
which first pinned this down dates from 1908,
and was developed by two
psychologists to show the
relationship between arousal and
performance. Yerkes and Dodson
had observed that performance
deteriorates, after arousal, or stress,
moves beyond a certain point.
Behaviour and management
researchers developed and refined
the Yerkes-Dodson Human
Performance Curve on this
law, and it forms part of
management theory and practice
in several fields.
The curve shows in a graphic form how the ‘best’ stress allows you to see a match between targets and your ability to achieve them, when what you have to give is more or less the same as what’s expected of you. This creates a ‘comfort zone’ where you are performing well, and likely to be gaining satisfaction. Different individuals have different comfort zones – there’s no one size fits all, and good management allows for this.
You can work at an intense level for short lengths of time, and after you meet the desired objectives you’re likely to need restorative gaps. A period of lower intensity between these high-performance periods allow you to gather your physical and emotional resources once more.
‘Negative’ stress happens when there’s a discrepancy between expectations and resources/ability – and most of us aren’t able to sustain a good performance under these conditions.
How to work well
Good management and effective working practices allow you to have ups and downs – with the ‘ups’ being the more important, more highly-valued part of your work, leaving the ‘downs’ for more routine tasks which are likely to be less demanding.
The curve also shows that where there’s too little stress, performance suffers, too. We need to be ‘aroused’ to work well – and we tail off if we don’t get that boost. In fact, stress builds up not because we have too much to do – on its own, simple overwork is less to ‘blame’ than the level of uncertainty we experience.
Difficult decision-making creates stress, conflict at work – perhaps between expectations and resources, perhaps because our role is not clear, feelings of failure and the pressure this creates….all this adds up to a stressful burden.
